China Ends Lockdown of Coronavirus Epicenter: Live Coverage


Coronavirus Live Updates: Boris Johnson Moved to Intensive Care and the U.S. Death Toll Surpasses 10,000

Wuhan lifts its lockdown, as Europe charts its next moves.

The Chinese city of Wuhan, the birthplace of the coronavirus pandemic, lifted its lockdown on Wednesday, allowing 11 million residents to leave their homes without special authorization for the first time in more than 10 weeks.

Wuhan’s reversal is a powerful symbolic victory for China that will be closely watched by the rest of the world, even as the contagion continues to spread quickly elsewhere — including in the United States, which is approaching 400,000 known infections. It may offer a window into how other places begin to restart damaged supply chains and return to a semblance of normalcy.

The next test may come in Europe, where the spread of the virus has started to slow in hard-hit countries like Italy and Spain. Some countries are now tiptoeing toward a loosening of radical lockdown measures that have been in place for close to a month.

A few examples:

  • Austria, one of the first countries to follow neighboring Italy into a lockdown in March, is allowing small shops to resume business after Easter.

  • Denmark plans to reopen day care centers and primary schools on April 15, assuming the pace of new coronavirus infections continues to stabilize.

  • The Czech Republic plans to loosen travel restrictions from Thursday, even though its state of emergency is to continue until the end of April.

But the global death toll — 1.4 million confirmed infections and 80,000 deaths — continues to rise. And most of Europe, India, much of the United States and many other places are under orders for businesses to close and most people to stay at home, abruptly crippling economies and throwing millions of people out of work.

News reports are filled with scenes of overflowing hospitals in New York City; uncollected bodies on streets in Ecuador; updates on the condition of Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain, who is hospitalized in intensive care; and expert warnings that the epidemic could be exploding, undetected, in the poorest parts of the world.

Virologists and public health officials in Europe say that loosening restrictions too swiftly could essentially produce the catastrophic scenario that the lockdowns have so far kept at bay, just a few weeks later.

“We cannot allow a wave that overwhelms out intensive care units like in Italy or New York,” said Walter Schachmayer, a Vienna-based mathematician who has been advising Chancellor Sebastian Kurz of Austria.

That explains why many European leaders are still holding off on announcing specific dates for loosening restrictions.

President Simonetta Sommaruga of Switzerland, for example, said on Tuesday that her government was working on different scenarios for easing confinement measures in the country “when the time comes.”

“We are still very far from normal,” she said.

How doctors and nurses risked everything as the coronavirus tore through northern Italy.

By the middle of March, northern Italy had become the epicenter of a global pandemic. The coronavirus had infected tens of thousands of Italians, devastating the country with Europe’s oldest population. In the region of Lombardy, where the virus first exploded in the West, a wealthy and advanced health care system had suddenly become a war zone.

Hospitals expanded intensive-care capacity, lined entire wards with ventilators and crowded corridors with oxygen tanks and beds. The doctors, nurses, paramedics and volunteers had little choice but to soldier through day and night with little rest. Quarantined at home, Italy’s civilians took notice. They applauded from their balconies and shared on the web photos of nurses collapsed at a desk or bearing the bruises of tight masks.

Those images reached the photographer Andrea Frazzetta in the Milan apartment where he was sheltering in place with his wife and their 4-year-old son, who had recovered from pneumonia several months earlier. Frazzetta had strongly urged his mother and father to do the same. But like many in and around Milan, they took the threat lightly and stayed home only when the central government in Rome ordered a shutdown, first in the north and then in the entire country. Looking at the selfies of those bruised nurses, Frazzetta decided to document the historic struggle unfolding around him.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain spent a second night in the intensive care unit of a London hospital on Tuesday battling symptoms, raising questions not just about the state of his health but about who would lead the country, gripped by a major outbreak, in his stead if that became necessary. In England alone, 758 patients were reported to have died in hospital in 24 hours, public health officials reported on Tuesday.

Mr. Johnson was transferred to the intensive care unit on Monday after his illness worsened. Aides said he had been moved in case he needed a ventilator to help his recovery. On Tuesday evening, the British foreign secretary, Dominic Raab, said that Mr. Johnson was “receiving standard oxygen treatment and breathing without any assistance,” like a ventilator.

As Britain has no written Constitution and no standard line of succession in the case of illness or death of the head of the government, it was for Mr. Johnson to decide who should stand in for him if he became ill. But the man he nominated, Mr. Raab, has been relatively untested, serving as the leader of the Foreign Office for less than a year.

While Mr. Johnson remains as the head of the government from his hospital bed, the seriousness of his illness means that could change quickly. At a time of extraordinary challenge, Mr. Raab is already serving as chairman of a key committee on the pandemic as the government battles to control the spread of the virus and stabilize an economy hit hard by the lockdown measures it has imposed.

Previous British prime ministers, including Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher, have had health issues while in power, but had brief periods of absence for planned procedures.

Mr. Johnson could be hospitalized for some time, and at a moment when the government must make major decisions about its virus response. Though some British prime ministers have nominated deputies, Mr. Johnson chose not to do so when he took the role last year.

The last time Britain experienced such a power vacuum was in 1953, when Winston Churchill suffered a stroke and the truth of his condition was kept from the British public.

Before going into intensive care, Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Raab to stand in for him “where necessary.”

Another senior minister, Michael Gove — who has had a lead role in coordinating the government’s response, including giving interviews on Mr. Johnson’s state of health — announced on Twitter on Tuesday that he was self-isolating. He felt well, he said, but a member of his family showed symptoms of the virus.

But Mr. Salomon warned that this did not mean the epidemic had peaked, because the number of new cases and new hospital patients was continuing to increase.

“I want to assure all parents that the tooth fairy has immunity against the coronavirus — there is no danger,” Mr. Legault said on the day Quebec released its projections for virus-related deaths. He did not weigh in on the Easter Bunny’s current legal status.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau does not have the authority to declare workers essential. But he has specifically addressed children during his daily briefings, and over the weekend took questions from children in an online broadcast.

Asked what song he uses to time his hand washing for the recommended 20 seconds, Mr. Trudeau said: “I like singing ‘Happy Birthday,’ because I like thinking that it might be my birthday today or any given day.”

For weeks, public health officials have surmised a link between dirty air and death or serious illness from Covid-19, which is caused by the coronavirus. The Harvard analysis is the first nationwide study to show a statistical link, revealing a “large overlap” between Covid-19 deaths and other diseases associated with long-term exposure to fine particulate matter.

The paper found that if Manhattan had lowered its average particulate matter level by just a single unit, or one microgram per cubic meter, over the past 20 years, the borough would most likely have seen 248 fewer Covid-19 deaths by this point in the outbreak.

Over all, the research could have significant implications for how public health officials choose to allocate resources like ventilators and respirators as the coronavirus spreads. The paper has been submitted for peer review and publication in the New England Journal of Medicine.

It found that just a slight increase in long-term pollution exposure could have serious coronavirus-related consequences, even accounting for other factors like smoking rates and population density.

China takes aim at a tycoon who criticized the government’s response to the outbreak.

William Grimes, Raphael Minder, Neil Genzlinger, Abdi Latif Dahir, Tariq Panja, Vanessa Friedman, Raymond Zhong, Vivian Wang, Katrin Bennhold, Javier C. Hernandez, Mike Ives, Russell Goldman, Dan Levin, Andrea Frazzetta, Jason Horowitz, Rick Gladstone, Victor Mather, Aurelien Breeden, Catherine Porter, Lisa Friedman and Ian Austen contributed.


Source link